淡水生态系统损害评价体系的构建与应用
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国科学院精密测量科学与技术创新研究院;2.生态环境部长江流域生态环境监督管理局生态环境监测与科学研究中心;3.中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所;4.中国科学院城市环境研究所;5.中国环境科学研究院;6.湖北省人民检察院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目


Construction and application of assessment system for freshwater ecosystem damage
Author:
Affiliation:

Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Fund Project:

National Key Research and Development Program of China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    淡水生态系统损害评估量化的缺失制约了我国环境司法与生态补偿的实施。为此,本研究依据国家生态环境损害鉴定评估标准,并结合环保执法的实际需求,构建了系统性的淡水生态系统损害评价指标体系。该体系涵盖环境质量、生物完整性和生态功能三个维度,划分为1个目标、2个次目标、8个准则和27个指标。本体系以三分法和四分位数计算指标的生态基线;同时,提供了从指标至目标的逐层计算公式,以生态损害指数(EDI)衡量生态系统受损程度,将EDI值1.2、1.5、2.0分别界定为轻度损害、中度损害和严重损害的阈值。以洪湖和咸宁某河为案例验证了该评价体系。为进一步提升体系的适用性,分析了准则因子的敏感度与评价精度,在确保精度的基础上筛选出优选准则因子(精度为R2 > 0.9和RMSE < 0.1);随后,通过相关性分析剔除了同一准则层中的非核心指标,最终制定出优先评价的1至4级组合清单,分别包括8、7、6、5个准则,涵盖13至21项指标。淡水生态系统损害评价体系的构建与应用不仅推动了我国水生态损害评价理论的发展,也为生态环境保护执法与生态补偿实践提供了有力的理论与方法支持。

    Abstract:

    The lack of freshwater ecosystem damage assessment system seriously hinders the implementation of environmental justice and ecological compensation in China. To address this gap, we developed a comprehensive freshwater ecosystem damage assessment system, guided by national standards for ecological environment damage assessment and the practical needs of environmental protection public interest litigation. The system encompasses three dimensions, including environmental quality, biological integrity and ecological function, and is structured into 1 target, 2 sub-targets, 8 criteria, and 27 indicators. In this system, the ecological baseline of the indicators is calculated by the trisection method and the quartile method, and hierarchical calculation formulas from the indicator to the target were provided. The degree of ecosystem damage is measured by the ecological damage index (EDI), with threshold values of 1.2, 1.5, and 2.0 representing mild, moderate, and severe damage, respectively. To validate the system’s applicability, case studies were conducted on Honghu Lake and a river in Xianning. To further improve the effectiveness of the system, the sensitivity and evaluation accuracy of the criterion factors was analyzed. Ensuring evaluation accuracy, we developed a prioritized combination list of assessment criteria (R2 > 0.9, RMSE < 0.1). Subsequently, non-core indicators in the same criterions were removed through correlation analysis. Finally, a prioritized combination list of 1 to 4 levels was provided, including 8, 7, 6, and 5 criteria, respectively, covering 14 to 21 indicators. The construction and application of this freshwater ecosystem damage assessment system not only advance the development of water ecological damage assessment theory in China, but also provide robust theoretical and methodological support for ecological environment protection law enforcement and ecological compensation practices.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-17
  • 最后修改日期:2025-09-08
  • 录用日期:2025-09-08
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-10-31
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第    位访问者
地址:南京市江宁区麒麟街道创展路299号    邮政编码:211135
电话:025-86882041;86882040     传真:025-57714759     Email:jlakes@niglas.ac.cn
Copyright:中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所《湖泊科学》 版权所有:All Rights Reserved
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

苏公网安备 32010202010073号

     苏ICP备09024011号-2