鄱阳湖碟形湖对越冬雁类的重要性评估与保护空缺识别
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

鄱阳湖越冬雁类时空动态对水文-植被耦合过程的响应机制


Importance of Sub-lakes in Poyang Lake for Wintering Geese: An Assessment and Conservation Gap Analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Fund Project:

Response of spatiotemporal dynamics of wintering geese to hydrology-vegetation coupling process in Poyang Lake

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    鄱阳湖作为中国最大的淡水湖,是东亚雁类重要的越冬地。本研究利用2019-2024年的卫星追踪数据,分析了白额雁(Anser albifrons)、鸿雁(Anser cygnoides)和豆雁(Anser fabalis)的迁徙时间节律和空间分布特征,并结合停留时间和家域分布,量化了鄱阳湖碟形湖的重要性。结果显示:不同雁类到达和离开时间存在物候差异。白额雁最早到达(10月16日至10月28日),其次是鸿雁(10月9日至11月30日),豆雁到达最晚(11月1日至11月17日),三种雁类在鄱阳湖越冬的时间分别约为 149±8天、123±7 天和 128±26 天。从迁徙时间动态来看,白额雁、豆雁相对稳定,年际差异较小,而鸿雁则年际差异较大。空间分析表明,保护区内的碟形湖仍然是雁类最重要的分布区,同时雁类在保护区外停留时间和家域面积都在增加,特别是豆雁和鸿雁。本研究量化了雁类对碟形湖的停留时间和空间利用,强调了其在支持迁徙雁类种群方面的生态作用,同时识别了雁类的重要保护区域,并确定了保护空缺区。我们建议扩大保护区范围以涵盖现有保护空缺,同时,加强保护区内外栖息地管理,以确保雁类重要越冬栖息地的可持续性。本研究为精准识别雁类关键栖息地,制定针对性的栖息地保护策略提供参考。

    Abstract:

    Poyang Lake, China’s largest freshwater lake, serves as a crucial wintering ground for geese of East Asian. This study employed satellite tracking data from 2019 to 2024 to analyze the migratory phenology and spatial distribution patterns of Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons, Swan Goose Anser cygnoides, and Bean Goose Anser fabalis. By integrating duration and home range data, we quantified the importance of Poyang Lake’s sub-lakes to these species. Our results demonstrate phenological differences in arrival and departure timing among the goose species. Greater White-fronted Geese arrived earliest (October 16th to October 28th), followed by Swan Geese (October 9th to November 30th), with Bean Geese arriving latest (November 1st to November 17th). The average overwintering duration in Poyang Lake was approximately 149±8 days for Greater White-fronted Geese, 123±7 days for Bean Geese, and 128±26 days for Swan Geese. Analysis of migratory timing dynamics revealed relative stability and low interannual variation for Greater White-fronted and Bean Geese, while Swan Geese exhibited greater interannual variability. Spatially, protected areas remained the most important distribution areas for geese. However, increasing duration and home range expansion outside of protected areas were observed, particularly for Bean and Swan Geese. This study quantified the duration and spatial utilization of geese in sub-lakes, highlighting their ecological role in supporting migratory goose populations. It also identified important conservation areas for geese and determined protection gaps. We recommend expanding protected area boundaries to cover existing protection gaps and strengthening habitat management measures both inside and outside protected areas to ensure the long-term sustainability of these important wintering habitats. This research provides scientific support for identifying critical habitats and developing targeted conservation strategies for geese and their habitats.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-24
  • 最后修改日期:2025-05-08
  • 录用日期:2025-05-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-22
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第    位访问者
地址:南京市江宁区麒麟街道创展路299号    邮政编码:211135
电话:025-86882041;86882040     传真:025-57714759     Email:jlakes@niglas.ac.cn
Copyright:中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所《湖泊科学》 版权所有:All Rights Reserved
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

苏公网安备 32010202010073号

     苏ICP备09024011号-2